Let Pandas Die out, Says Naturalist
Naturalist Chris Packham suggests the pandas have worked themselves into an "evolutionary cul-de-sac" without any recourse for survival. What a horrible person! Packham suggests we should pour the millions of dollars spent on resuscitating the panda population into other species that have a better chance of survival. He has the same nihilist opinion about wild endangered tigers as well, noting that they are worth more dead than alive. In regard to the panda, Packham states that:
"It's not a strong species. Unfortunately it's big and cute and it's a symbol of the WWF (Worldwide Fund for Nature) -- and we pour millions of pounds into panda conservation."
"I reckon we should pull the plug. Let them go, with a degree of dignity ..."
Fantastic. I'm for humanitarian euthanasia (concerning both humans and animals)but if 1,600 pandas are contentedly thriving within their environment, albeit a quickly disappearing one, the more power to the adorable creatures.
No comments:
Post a Comment